Nope, it’s not ‘feminist’ to use rape to encourage racial segregation

It’s time we called out Apartheid Annas for what they were

“The word “racist” has been used so loosely and so often…” begins Sarah, robed in an embarrassingly incorrect UK flag. I don’t need to tell you, dear ladies and gentlemen, but I would personally argue that Sarah is not loosely racist, but a committed, avowed, and fervent one. “I am not far-right: I am a concerned mother and a member of my community who cares deeply about the future of our children and our country. I will always stand for what I believe is right. I would rather die on my feet than live a life on my knees.”

Sigh. Is it 1933?

Hang on there, Madelaine, some of you are probably typing out in the comments. Foreign cultures can be deeply sexist towards women, and sexualise young children! It’s not racist for her to peacefully raise that, surely? You can’t call her a racist over that? Well, perhaps you’ll indulge me when I tell you what The Pink Ladies, the group Segregation Sarah is a proud and open part of, wants.

What does this brave, noble group argue for? A de-facto ban on immigrant and asylum seeking men from settling near schools, on their council estates, and in their areas. They may not have a written manifesto (they aren’t very smart, listen to their interviews), but their rhetoric leaves no doubt about their intent. You know, a bit of casual apartheid because brown men, naturally, are collectively a…